So I learned today the DA’s office dropped the case when they learned the protective order judge denied a PO, because the stalker lied in court. The last incident/threat being last June, the DA’s own Victim’s Witness Center “advocate” advised me in November to STILL file for a PO which I did on her advise weeks later in December.
But that was too late for the judge. Doing what they advised me to do back-fired in my face. It was deemed he was not currently a threat by a leftist, transsexual judge who would have looked at the email threat sent to my traditional Catholic blog email. You can’t make this his stuff up.
The PO judge didn’t take the time to read through YEARS of hard evidence of a long term pattern of stalking. For her-him, they didn’t see the forrest from the trees, that the pattern isn’t immediate or short term but typically every 6 to 24 months. Hence likely recurrence. It was common sense. I don’t think it’s because she doesn’t know the law, but because I was a man reporting stalking by another man which is admittedly freaky. He-she discriminated against an actual man.
The asst. DA (probably just out of law school) wouldn’t give me the time of day to listen to me on the phone answering my questions, me making the above point, me being polite, when suddenly some crazy, loud woman started talking who had been listening into the call, neither telling me she was part of the call.
So be it. I will sue the City but first sue the stalker blog troll. I’m thankful to the stalker blog troll. I’ll garnish his wages (and inheritance) probably for the rest of his life.
The $1,000,000 I was already going to file for, just went up to $1,500,000. That’s an extra $500,000 for him lying about me in court, ruining the case, getting off with no punishment, with no deterrent to ever stop, and therefore a long term state of safety concerns for me and my family. The personal injury spans THIRTY years.
He’ll get much worse punishment than community service or a month in jail, which I requested to the DA office. His choice. That’s the long term consequence.
And all I have to show is my claims are more than 50% likely to be true, whereas criminal court requires “beyond a reasonable doubt.” A stack of evidence from 3 police reports covering 4 years, witnesses, his violent felony and long criminal history, and my previous protective order against him.
The fact that six months after his last act of stalking a protective order judge decided by that date there is not a current threat, doesn’t even begin to negate the past.
Well, at least the criminal phase is over. Now it’s civil court. I hope he has money for a lawyer.
If you’re a victim of crime especially harassment or stalking, at least in Tulsa, expect extremely shady and moronic treatment by every government official involved. This is common in Oklahoma institutions, to victim blame because since authorities lack the maturity and sensibilities to tackle this in court.
Hence Marsy’s law, an actual amendment to the Oklahoma Constitution, which they violated probably a dozen times, the PO judge and ADA therefore are NOT covered by immunity.
The Tulsa courts are not what you’d expect in a First World Nation.
Life goes on.